Subject: [du-list] Excellent rebuttal to nuclear industry and NATO arguments
Date:  Sat, 3 Feb 2001
From: "Cat" <cat@freewomen.freeserve.co.uk>

NATO and the US DoE and the IAEA continually repeat the old tired logic that if the radiation dose is too low, it can't possibly be responsible for the illnesses we are seeing.  They use the statutory dose-risk models to deny harm, rather than looking at the harm and opening their minds to a revision of the dose-risk model.  Please note that Dr. Chris Busby's Second Event theory, as well as other writing on this topic, has successfully rebutted this idea. He makes a plea for sound science, based on empirical data, not on mathematical models.   Please make sure these ideas are widely circulated.  They are extremely important for all downwinders' court cases, for those affected by DU, and for those living near nuclear power plants.

See the information at:
http://www.llrc.org/depleted_uranium.htm

See also other crucial original research and documents at the main Low-Level Radiation Campaign website,
http://www.llrc.org



Commento: la LLRC è quella che sta facendo la campagna dei dentini da latte in Inghilterra. La Nato è la Nuclear Atomic Threatening Organization.